Henry VIII †Success or Failure? Essay

total heat the eighth was born in 1491. His fathers approximate persist mean valuet that heat content succeeded the thr star without any problem. He became force in 1509. He was undismayed and skilled, also ruthless and savage oneness of his first actions was to behead two despised tax collectors. This made him popular. He hook up with Catherine of Aragorn his brothers widow. This was against church rules, scarce the Pope gave special permission. henry worn-out(a) any of the specie his father had disposed(p) him on battle against France. This was the battle of Spurs, 1513 the french spurred their horses and ran away straight away. Meanwhile, Scotland attacked England. Catherine of Aragorn and heat contents nobles quickly built up an army. A tactical error on the side of meat of the Scots meant that Scotland lost and suffered a governmental happening.He also had umteen friends one famous one was Thomas Wolsey. Wolseys intelligence had meant that he hade gone fr om rags to riches. atomic number 1 made him rich and unchewable galore(postnominal) peck said that Wolsey was more powerful than atomic number 1. However, when Wolsey asked the Pope non to grant Henrys divorce, Henry told him to attend a court trial which meant that he would go back to rags. Wolsey died just before the trial.Henrys divorce is one of the about important religious changes in History. To borrow it, he changed Englands church so that it was separate (but still Catholic) from the Pope who wouldnt grant him a divorce. He thusly simply asked his archbishop to grant him a divorce. This created the church building of England and later meant that England would become Protestant.In instal to get a male child, he espouse three times. He then get hitched with another three times. He conjoin Catherine of Aragorn, Anne Boleyn, Jane Seymour, Anne of Cleves, Catherine Howard and Katherine Parr. Of these, 2 were beheaded.He decided to chuck out down the monasteries, possibly due to the concomitant that they own 1/4 of Englands land and were really rich his relieve was that some did a great(p) job. The 1535 foreboding(a) Book of the Monasteries was a biased score on how well the monasteries functioned. By 1536, many another(prenominal) smaller monasteries had been shut.In Yorkshire, where the monasteries were very candid, on that point was an uprising of 30,000 men. Henry crushed this by lying to the rebels, waiting until they disbanded and then breakout his promise. This meant that by 1540, nearly 400 monasteries and their lands were owned by the king. Henry spent his destruction years fighting with Spain and France.To determine whether Henry was successful of not, we must first think, what is a successful king? What makes an unsuccessful king? Kings and Queens much(prenominal) as bloody shame Tudor and King John ware often been called tribulations because they were not popular. At times, Henry was not popular at all he had a gr eat uprising. Does this mean that he was definitely a hardship?Henry did many good and unspeakable things during his reign. He was very ruthless he executed many people without congruous reason. He spent all of his money on wars. He lied and was authoritative and greedy. He also protected England from assail countries. He changed the church and destroyed the monasteries. His son succeeded the potentiometer without any problem.Henry himself had a unspeakable personality. He did, however, improve the democracy a mess, keep it safe from fence countries and keep his Barons and rebels under control. If you look at it one way, Henry had a bad personality, married 6 times and would not have been a very prudish person to be with (he executed people without thinking). He was however a very successful king and England did gain a lot from him. He went to a lot of trouble to prevent political disaster and acquire a male heir. If universe a successful king requires a good personalit y, then Henry was a failure. But if being a good king depends on how many good things he did for his country, he would have been a successful king.Henry did however, do many bad things that some other failure monarchs would probably not have done, such as ignore and mistreat his children/wives and go under out with the Catholic Church. In conclusion, Henry VI was a dictator and a failure, but his motives were not all bad and he, although using ruthless measures did succeed in his main aim to secure the throne of England with a male heir. Therefore overall, if the historiographer studies what he achieved, then he achieved a great deal more than many other monarchs and is therefore a success.